Abalone, raw vs Cuttlefish, cooked

Abalone, raw2

Leader

Cuttlefish, cooked6

Cuttlefish, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Cuttlefish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Cuttlefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Cuttlefish, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
105 kcal
158 kcal
Proteinmore is better
17.1 g
32.48 gWIN
Carbohydrate
6.01 g
1.64 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
—
Total fat
0.76 g
1.4 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0.15 g
0.24 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN301 mg
744 mg
Potassiummore is better
250 mg
637 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
31 mg
180 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
3.19 mg
10.84 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
48 mg
60 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
2 mg
8.5 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.