Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw3
VS
Cuttlefish, cooked Leader
Cuttlefish, cooked5

Cuttlefish, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Cuttlefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Cuttlefish, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.29 g
    20.56 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.72 g
    1.04 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.72 g
    0.89 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.14 g
    0.15 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN286.67 mg
    470.89 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.1 mg
    403.16 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    29.52 mg
    113.92 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    3.04 mg
    6.86 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN45.71 mg
    37.97 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.9 mg
    5.38 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Cuttlefish, cooked · Foodatron